[chiphu]

Originally Posted by yulong

Can you write it in another way? I still haven't understood it.

You've yet to understand what, dude? The "explain me" thing or what?

[Mr.Brick]

Originally Posted by yulong

Thanks.

We're all VOZers right? VOZers are brothers.

Yup, VOZers are all gay, so we should do it comfortably, lightly and unpainfully together

[Daviath.]

Want to be beated...
Need some brick

[akicuabo]

Originally Posted by chiphu

yulong's totally damn right, and there's no use in digging in what situation it brings because the syntax is plain in there and compulsory for us to do or say it right.

"There's nothing I could do but leave the car", meaning that leaving the car is only one choice for them and they didn't have no other way to do. In this case, the correct conjunction for the right syntax is "but".

We use "instead of" when we have multiple choices to get rid of that freaking situation. For instance, instead of leaving the car, they spent the night in the car and fucked on the back seat.



This is one of the son-of-the-bitch inversions ("đảo ngữ" in Vietnamese, if you will). Inversion is used when we want to emphasize what we mean and used in several certain cases. Jump here or here to read more.


Grap this page and scroll to the point D to understand why.

[color="Red"]Never say "explain me" because there's no situation in English for us to say like that. It's to say: Explain something to somebody > explain it/that to me.
Well, you actually could use "explain me" in case where you want to refer yourself in the third person[/COLOR]

Your sentence is short and I read it thoroughly. I believe that if you are not too arrogant, you may see the mistake.
What follows "in case" should be a clause. A clause should have a subject and a verb. In your sentence, following in case was "where you want to refer..." the whole of which is a noun (or a subject) which refers to (in this case) a situation. Hence, it is NOT a clause and you should omit "where". If you don't agree, provide a convincing proof, OK?

The sentence should be "refer to your self in the third person". You forgot to put the preposition "to" in your original statement. Did you read your own sentence carefully?

[chiphu]

Originally Posted by akicuabo

Your sentence is short and I read it thoroughly. I believe that if you are not too arrogant, you may see the mistake.
What follows "in case" should be a clause. A clause should have a subject and a verb. In your sentence, following in case was "where you want to refer..." the whole of which is a noun (or a subject) which refers to (in this case) a situation. Hence, it is NOT a clause and you should omit "where". If you don't agree, provide a convincing proof, OK?

The sentence should be "refer to your self in the third person". You forgot to put the preposition "to" in your original statement. Did you read your own sentence carefully?

Well, well, well...

Originally Posted by akicuabo

Did you read your own sentence carefully?

First, tell you what, I got an illness of slow typing. It ain't good I know, but it's helpful for me to easily control what I'm typing. So...

Originally Posted by akicuabo

What follows "in case" should be a clause. A clause should have a subject and a verb. In your sentence, following in case was "where you want to refer..." the whole of which is a noun (or a subject) which refers to (in this case) a situation. Hence, it is NOT a clause and you should omit "where". If you don't agree, provide a convincing proof, OK?

Oh no, come on, please you guys please! Don't take the word "where" away from its house "in case where".

Of course, I could've used "in case" instead, but it seems you guys never seen "in case where" anywhere before, isn't it? So, hit it, hit Google for me please.

Ah, thanks for your compliment, not too arrogant, I like that

[akicuabo]

Originally Posted by chiphu

Well, well, well...

First, tell you what, I got an illness of slow typing. It ain't good I know, but it's helpful for me to easily control what I'm typing. So...

Oh no, come on, please you guys please! Don't take the word "where" away from its house "in case where".

Of course, I could've used "in case" instead, but it seems you guys never seen "in case where" anywhere before, isn't it? So, hit it, hit Google for me please.

Ah, thanks for your compliment, not too arrogant, I like that

example please, with source of course

[Wise Blue]

Originally Posted by yulong

Thanks.

to Wise Blue: If you want to update yourself to a totally new version, you should be more friendly. Don't use "excuse me", it's not friendly....something like "hey" is better...
This topic is where we learn English together, right? So if you think it's a strange syntax that I or somebody doesn't know it, you should explain to us. We're all VOZers right? VOZers are brothers.

Oh yeah,my little big brother

[Wise Blue]

Originally Posted by akicuabo

example please, with source of course

source google.com.vn


i'll add image later,guy

[Ghosthammer]

Originally Posted by Wise Blue

source google.com.vn

i'll add image later,guy
[IMG]+http://img96.imageshack.us/img96/7699/48499531.png[/IMG]

read it carefully and think about it before doing anything.
your search result that you've pointed out including "In case + bla bla bla" not only "in case where + phrase"
at that point, you've misunderstand akicuabo's post. He point out that he think Chiphu had made some mistake (... in case where you want to refer in the 3rd person [ ... In case where + Object 1+ Object 2]).
when you google that, it only show "... In case where + noun + verb +Object"
for example

Woman Pleads Guilty In Case Where Boy Hid In Oven

link

[Wise Blue]

Originally Posted by Ghosthammer

read it carefully and think about it before doing anything.
your search result that you've pointed out including "In case + bla bla bla" not only "in case where + phrase"
at that point, you've misunderstand akicuabo's post. He point out that he think Chiphu had made some mistake (... in case where you want to refer in the 3rd person [ ... In case where + Object 1+ Object 2]).
when you google that, it only show "... In case where + noun + verb +Object"
for example

link

Sry,man,just google,didn't watch it
busy playing game