[trunghq]

Topic:
You should spend about 40 minutes on this task.

Children are big target audience for advertisers. Companies hope that if they start selling products to children at an early age, children will continue to buy the products when they are adults. Some people are against advertising to children. They say that children should not be targets because they are too easily affected by advertising.

What is your opinion? Should advertisers be allowed to advertise to children? Why or why not?

You should use your own ideas, knowledge and experience and support your arguments with examples and relevant evidence.

Write at least 250 words.



Answer:
It is noticeable that marketing companies have been increasingly placing great emphasis on winning younger customers. However, while advertising to children is significantly effective, it also comes with disadvantages. Personally, I am of the opinion that advertisers have no rights to target children.

For a variety of reasons, misleading advertisements raise a concern over adverse effects on children’s mind. Firstly, at the very young age, children are not cognitively able to identify selling purposes. As a result, they are highly likely to believe in what are conveyed in advertising messages invented intentionally to make the sale. Fox example, the texts and visuals might be designed with bad role models such as a violent hero or a shopaholic super model. Secondly, excessive exposure to advertisements leads to the cases in which children smoke, use alcohol and adopt unhealthy lifestyles. These negative consequences would noticeably carry over to adulthood if not prevented.

It is no doubt that commercial advertisements have an undesirable impact on educating children. If there were no longer advertisements on clients under 10, grown-ups would find teaching their sons and daughters relatively trouble-free. In fact, it seems that advertisers meet their target of the entire family by affecting significantly young minds. Take parents of those obsessed with kids products as an example, their offspring steadily increase their demands, whereas pampering unquestionably leads to a spoiled generation.

In sum, it is undeniable that advertising bring about both pros and cons, but in my opinion there should be a ban on advertisements on children under a certain age.

[greatwarriorjakk]

cảm ơn thớt trước

[nhonhe2011]

Thím cho em hỏi toeic thì dư nào ạ

[trunghq]

Originally Posted by nhonhe2011

Thím cho em hỏi toeic thì dư nào ạ

Giáo Văn Làng

Thì đấy.

[ngaybanvainick]

Thớt IELTS mấy chấm rồi vậy?

[trunghq]

Originally Posted by ngaybanvainick

Thớt IELTS mấy chấm rồi vậy?

Em tầm 7.0 - 7.5, Task 2 tầm 7.5 - 8.0, Task 1 thì 7.0 - 8.0.

[ngaybanvainick]

Originally Posted by trunghq

Em tầm 7.0 - 7.5, Task 2 tầm 7.5 - 8.0, Task 1 thì 7.0 - 8.0.

B chưa thi hay sao mà phải ước lượng thế

[vothevinh]

Originally Posted by trunghq

Topic:
The graph illustrates the share price of Outokumpu companies in euros from January 2006 to December 2010. It is noticeable that there were considerable fluctuations and a decline overall over the five-year period.

Starting from EUR 13 per share at the beginning of the stage, this price went up and down gradually until late 2006. After that, it decreased sharply on February 2007, reaching a peak of EUR 31 and then falling dramatically again.

In the beginning of the year 2008, there was a downward trend, which initiated from the second highest hit in mid-2008 and ended in the lowest point of merely EUR 7 per share in the start of the following year.

Despite a number of significant changes between 2009 and the first half of 2010, the figure continued to rise and this upward trend simply finished until it reached a peak of EUR 17 in early 2010, followed later by a steady drop in the last months of 2010.

bài của mình:

The line graph illustrates the share price of the Outokumpu companies in a five-year span, from Jan 2006 to Dec 2010. The companies have experienced strong fluctuation with many ups and downs.

Starting as much as 13 euros in early 2006s, the price went up sharply, reaching 31 euros by the year’s end. From 2007 to mid-2008, their share prices went down by a small margin but then recovered back to 30 euros, which is still lower than the peak set in early 2007.

The final half of 2008 saw Outokumpu’s stocks plummeting to a record low, at a mere 7 euros per share by December 2008. The recover period lasted two years afterwards until 2010, in which their stocks slowly gained momentum and were finally valued at 14 euros by the end of 2010.

In short, despite all the fluctuations, Outokumpu’s stock price remain virtually the same value in five years.

[trunghq]

Originally Posted by vothevinh

bài của mình:

The line graph illustrates the share price of the Outokumpu companies in a five-year span, from Jan 2006 to Dec 2010. The companies have experienced strong fluctuation with many ups and downs.

Starting as much as 13 euros in early 2006s, the price went up sharply, reaching 31 euros by the year’s end. From 2007 to mid-2008, their share prices went down by a small margin but then recovered back to 30 euros, which is still lower than the peak set in early 2007.

The final half of 2008 saw Outokumpu’s stocks plummeting to a record low, at a mere 7 euros per share by December 2008. The recover period lasted two years afterwards until 2010, in which their stocks slowly gained momentum and were finally valued at 14 euros by the end of 2010.

In short, despite all the fluctuations, Outokumpu’s stock price remain virtually the same value in five years.

Gửi mail 2 bài, Task 1 + 2. Thím xem #1 nhé.

[trunghq]

Originally Posted by ngaybanvainick

B chưa thi hay sao mà phải ước lượng thế

Viết nó lồ lộ ra đấy cần gì ước lượng đâu. Còn tại sao phải tầm là vì trình độ của bài này và bài kia không giống nhau, có bài viết trội hơn.