[yulong]

Originally Posted by Wise Blue

@chiphu i didn't know you were that good with English
Well,i have a little problem everyone,
I'm studying to become an English teacher but i don't like working with too much people,i prefer to work as a translator/editor or something like that
Can i get those jobs when i graduate ? does anyone have any experience with my problem ?

It's good, no worries dude

Originally Posted by chiphu

Oh, I see, but it ain't wrong, dude. Say, "you want to refer to yourself in the third person" is a full sentence, which the preposition "in" belongs to, while the conjunction "in case where" is a unique element. So, this "where" from "in case where" has nothing to do with that "in" from "in the third person".

You got me wrong bro :"> I didn't mean that, there isn't a prep. following (where + clause).
Did you mean: "Well, you actually could use "explain me" in case you want to refer to yourself as the third person" ?

[Ghosthammer]

Originally Posted by Wise Blue

you haven't forgotten about me,have you ?

you are the 2.0, so i did not have any memory about you(as you say, you're the whole new you, the old ones is death, or have been deleted)

damn, do anybody have any information about MBA program of Drexel University?
i'm not so sure about the requirement, about the score, of course

[Wise Blue]

Originally Posted by yulong

It's good, no worries dude

excuse me,what's wrong with that "with" in blue

[yulong]

"at" should be correct.
And btw, "were" should be replaced by "are"

[Wise Blue]

Originally Posted by yulong

"at" should be correct.
And btw, "were" should be replaced by "are"

uhm,i used "with" with the meaning"he can use something well"
and for the word "were",it's mean he's already good at English,and in the past i didn't know he was that good
any comment,bro ?

[yulong]

Originally Posted by Wise Blue

uhm,i used "with" with the meaning"he can use something well"
and for the word "were",it's mean he's already good at English,and in the past i didn't know he was that good
any comment,bro ?

in that case it should use "have been..."

[Sannomiya]

Originally Posted by chiphu

- "in case where..", what's the problem with that?

- Yeah, right, refer to oneself.
So, "explain me" in, like "I need to explain me!", means I need to show who the true me is, and "me" in this case is the third person. It's simple as that.

In case of smth or In case + phrase. If you put where in to the latter half of your sentence it no longer is a phrase because it lacks a verb. "Where i want to live is my homeland is a phrase". SO, as yulong has said you should omit where.
I need to explain myself is better, isn't it?

Or you should you "as" instead of "in"

[yulong]

Originally Posted by Sannomiya

In case of smth or In case + phrase. If you put where in to the latter half of your sentence it no longer is a phrase because it lacks a verb. "Where i want to live is my homeland is a phrase". SO, as yulong has said you should omit where.
I need to explain myself is better, isn't it?

Or you should you "as" instead of "in"

Thanks.

to Wise Blue: If you want to update yourself to a totally new version, you should be more friendly. Don't use "excuse me", it's not friendly....something like "hey" is better...
This topic is where we learn English together, right? So if you think it's a strange syntax that I or somebody doesn't know it, you should explain to us. We're all VOZers right? VOZers are brothers.

[chiphu]

Originally Posted by Sannomiya

In case of smth or In case + phrase. If you put where in to the latter half of your sentence it no longer is a phrase because it lacks a verb. "Where i want to live is my homeland is a phrase". SO, as yulong has said you should omit where.
I need to explain myself is better, isn't it?

Or you should you "as" instead of "in"

Please re-read my sentence, bro, before speaking a correction out!

And there's no excuse for using "as" instead of "in" while "in the third person" is normally being said ^^

[yulong]

Originally Posted by chiphu

Please re-read my sentence, bro, before speaking a correction out!

And there's no excuse for using "as" instead of "in" while "in the third person" is normally being said ^^

Can you write it in another way? I still haven't understood it.