[7dayspwk]

Originally Posted by beautifu.l.ife

what should we say" do a part time job in X company" or " do a part time job for X company"

I think the 2 ones are acceptable, it depends on the meaning that u wanna express

[hotmitlui]

I love eating "Sấu bao tử". Could someone give me them?

[tranhieuamg]

Originally Posted by beautifu.l.ife

the first u went for were wrong. it's must be" right"(this is the answer from my source)

may i have the source?

[tranhieuamg]

Originally Posted by beautifu.l.ife

what should we say" do a part time job in X company" or " do a part time job for X company"

in which context is this sentence being used in? if it is for casual conversing people don't usually say 'do a part time job', but rather 'have a part time job' or 'work part time'. in either case we use normal collocations 'for ', 'at ', 'on [area?]', 'in [large area]' and so on.

should be pretty much the same for written english i suppose, but 'do part time job' sounds a bit awkward, and it gives the impression you are working on short term basis. it's hard to explain but i hardly see any one wrote 'i did a part time job blahblahblah', not that there's something wrong with the grammar, it's more about formality thou.

[I_Smile]

i am so sad.

[trumbantia2012]

Originally Posted by hellcha

really? I thought we have to take a test to specify our class, if it shows that I fit the ielts 1, why should i choose the "breakfast"???

yes, you have to take the test to choose your class. Normally you will be taken to class IELTS 2, however, as I said before, you can tell the receptionist to learn at class "Breakfast"

[Coming-soon]

Originally Posted by tranhieuamg

in which context is this sentence being used in? if it is for casual conversing people don't usually say 'do a part time job', but rather 'have a part time job' or 'work part time'. in either case we use normal collocations 'for ', 'at ', 'on [area?]', 'in [large area]' and so on....

for me, it's both commonly and briefly to say: "I work 'for' X company 'as a part-timer'. 'at'. On the other hand, can be put in place of 'for' but seems less usual than 'for' and specifically used when indicating the presence in some place in person. e.g. You can work 'for' [for the favour of] that X company but you may be not forced to put in appearance 'at' the office to get your work underway.. that, I guess, is the most noticable distinction between these two terms.
Best regards
Coming-soon

[beautifu.l.ife]

Originally Posted by tranhieuamg

in which context is this sentence being used in? if it is for casual conversing people don't usually say 'do a part time job', but rather 'have a part time job' or 'work part time'. in either case we use normal collocations 'for ', 'at ', 'on [area?]', 'in [large area]' and so on.

should be pretty much the same for written english i suppose, but 'do part time job' sounds a bit awkward, and it gives the impression you are working on short term basis. it's hard to explain but i hardly see any one wrote 'i did a part time job blahblahblah', not that there's something wrong with the grammar, it's more about formality thou.

thanks bro. actually, ii don't know why did i write "DO" in favor of "have"
so, in this case we should use for, should'n we

Originally Posted by Coming-soon

for me, it's both commonly and briefly to say: "I work 'for' X company 'as a part-timer'. 'at'. On the other hand, can be put in place of 'for' but seems less usual than 'for' and specifically used when indicating the presence in some place in person. e.g. You can work 'for' [for the favour of] that X company but you may be not forced to put in appearance 'at' the office to get your work underway.. that, I guess, is the most noticable distinction between these two terms.
Best regards
Coming-soon

thanks bro. 'cuz i'm writing CV so i thing it's must be shorten

[beautifu.l.ife]

Originally Posted by hellcha

Actually, right and rightly in this case are both adv; however, right is used with usual verb, and rightly comes before and after adj. So if i have to choose, i'll go for rightly.
the second one, i'll go for widely. Wide and widely are very different; the guy above mentioned about it,

Originally Posted by beautifu.l.ife

the first u went for were wrong. it's must be" right"(this is the answer from my source)

i do sorry bro, there're st wrong in my source. i asked a lot of friends and they also have the same asnser like bro

Originally Posted by tranhieuamg

may i have the source?

oops, i can't remember where did i download from. i has downloaded it for a year,it's a word file with a lot of questions include answers. there're st wrong with that file, maybe it's mistype

[blackbuddha]

Originally Posted by hotmitlui

you're really talkative

No harm has been done .